Guidelines


Submission and Editorial Policies

These guidelines explain the editorial policies, formatting requirements, and ethical standards for manuscripts submitted to AI & Antiquity. Authors are encouraged to read them carefully before beginning the submission process.

Submit via OJS Submission Checklist
Submission Languages Article Types Formatting Abstract Figures Citation Ethics Preservation Peer Review AI Policy Copyright Checklist

1. Submission Process

 

Authors should submit manuscripts through the Open Journal Systems (OJS) platform. Complete metadata must be provided for every author, including institutional affiliation, ORCID iD, and email address.

Within approximately thirty days, the Editorial Team will notify authors whether the manuscript has passed the initial editorial assessment.

Only submissions that fit the aims of the journal and meet the required scholarly standards will proceed to external double-blind peer review.

2. Accepted Languages & Scope

 
  • Must be original, unpublished work, and not under review elsewhere.
  • Accepted languages: Catalan, Spanish, English, French, Portuguese, and Italian.
  • All manuscripts must be rigorously anonymised to ensure an unbiased review process.

3. Article Types

 

Research Articles

5,000 – 10,000 words

Teaching Reports

2,500 – 5,000 words

Critical Reviews

1,000 – 2,500 words

4. Formatting Requirements

 
Format Microsoft Word (.docx)
Font Cambria 12 pt
Spacing 1.15 line spacing
Footnotes Cambria 10 pt
Foreign Words Italicized

5. Abstract and Keywords

 

Every manuscript must include a title, abstract, and keywords in both the original language and English.

Title

Must be provided in both the original language and English.

Abstract

200–300 words describing the objectives, sources, and methodology.

Keywords

Exactly five keywords in both languages for indexing purposes.

6. Figures, Tables and Visual Material

 
  • Figures and tables must be numbered consecutively throughout the manuscript.
  • Every illustration requires a descriptive caption and clear citation of its source.
  • AI-generated images must indicate the model, generation date, and prompt whenever possible.
Required End-Order of Materials:
  1. References
  2. Tables
  3. Figures

7. Citation Style

 

AI & Antiquity follows the APA 7th edition style with minor editorial adaptations to ensure bibliographical consistency across ancient world studies.

In-text Citations

Narrative

Ross and Baines (2024, p. 185) argue that...

Parenthetical

...as previously observed (Ross & Baines, 2024, p. 185).

Reference List Rules

  • Use & (or and depending on original language guidelines) between authors.
  • Titles of articles must be enclosed in single quotation marks.
  • Book and journal titles must be in italics.
  • Provide DOIs formatted as hyperlinks (e.g., https://doi.org/xxxxx).
  • Online resources must include an access date.

Examples

Book

Boden, M. A. (2018). Artificial Intelligence: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.

Journal Article

Luckin, R. (2017). 'Towards artificial intelligence-based assessment systems'. Journal of Tech Pedagogy, 12(3), 14–29.

Book Chapter

McCarty, W. (2004). 'Modeling the past'. In S. Schreibman (Ed.), Companion to Digital Humanities (pp. 254-270). Blackwell.

Website

Abideen, Z. (2023). AI tools in historical research. Historical Tech Network. Retrieved May 12, 2025, from https://htn.org/ai-tools

8. Ethical Standards

 
  • Adherence to the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) Code of Conduct.
  • Absolute intolerance of plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and redundant publication. All submissions undergo routine plagiarism screening during the editorial assessment phase prior to external peer review.
  • No honorary or guest authorship; all authors must have contributed substantially.
  • Mandatory disclosure of any potential conflicts of interest.
  • Commitment to research integrity, data transparency, and academic rigor.

9. Digital Preservation

 

To ensure the long-term preservation and accessibility of its scholarly content, AI & Antiquity participates in the PKP Preservation Network (PKP PN). This service provides secure, decentralized preservation of published articles and supports permanent access to the journal's academic record.

Editorial Workflow

10. Peer Review Process

 
01

Submission

Manuscript uploaded through OJS portal.

02

Editorial Check

Review of scope, anonymity, and format.

03

Peer Review

Double-blind assessment by expert referees.

04

Decision

Acceptance, revision request, or rejection.

05

Publication

Open access release on the journal platform.

11. Artificial Intelligence Policy

 

As reflected in its title, AI & Antiquity is committed to fostering a thoughtful dialogue between artificial intelligence and the study of the ancient world. The journal recognizes AI both as an emerging subject of scholarly inquiry and as a valuable set of tools capable of enriching research, teaching, and academic communication. At the same time, it reaffirms that originality, critical judgment, ethical responsibility, and scholarly accountability remain exclusively human responsibilities.

This section summarises the practical requirements for submission. It should be read together with the journal's full AI & Scholarship statement, which sets out the underlying principles in detail — including the journal's position that responsible AI use and principled non-use are equally legitimate, and that neither will advantage or disadvantage an author in editorial evaluation.

  • Generative AI tools may be used as supportive aids for research, translation, language revision, coding, data analysis, and other scholarly workflows. Authors are equally free to prepare their work without AI assistance; this choice will not be treated as a mark of professional deficiency or as evidence of methodological superiority.
  • AI systems cannot be credited as authors. Authorship requires intellectual responsibility, scholarly judgment, and accountability, which remain exclusively human responsibilities.
  • Authors remain fully and solely responsible for the originality, accuracy, integrity, and legality of all submitted content, regardless of any AI assistance used during its preparation.
  • What must be disclosed: any substantial use of generative AI must be disclosed upon submission, including the tool used, version (where available), purpose of use, and the sections of the work affected. Substantial use means AI assistance that materially contributes to the generation, analysis, interpretation, organisation, or presentation of scholarly content. Routine functions such as spelling correction, basic formatting, reference-management automation, or standard software features do not normally require disclosure unless they materially affect the intellectual content of the work.
  • Authors are responsible for verifying all AI-generated content, including factual claims, citations, translations, data interpretations, code, and visual materials.
  • The journal does not rely on automated AI-detection tools, writing style, vocabulary, or subjective impressions of fluency as sufficient evidence of undisclosed AI use or academic misconduct. Concerns regarding originality or integrity must be supported by relevant evidence and will be assessed through editorial evaluation, plagiarism screening, and peer review; where a substantive concern arises, the author concerned will normally be given an opportunity to respond before any conclusion is reached. The journal does not permit suspicion of AI use to be used as a means of harassment, insinuation, or reputational harm.
  • Editors and reviewers may use AI-assisted tools only when confidentiality, data protection, and manuscript security can be fully guaranteed. Unpublished manuscripts, reviewer reports, and other confidential materials must not be entered into external AI systems where this would compromise confidentiality. Human experts retain full responsibility for all editorial and review decisions.
  • Consistent with its mission to foster dialogue between artificial intelligence and Ancient Studies, AI & Antiquity supports the critical, transparent, and proportionate use of AI technologies in research, teaching, and scholarly communication, in accordance with the principles of academic integrity, openness, and scientific rigor — while fully respecting the decision of any author, reviewer, or editor not to use AI at all.
Ready to submit? Submission Checklist
 
✓ Original manuscript
✓ Not under review elsewhere
✓ Anonymous version prepared
✓ Word document (.docx) format
✓ English title & abstract included
✓ Five precise keywords
✓ APA references double-checked
✓ Figures properly labelled & cited
✓ ORCID IDs for all authors
✓ Conflicts of interest declared
✓ AI use disclosed, if substantial (tool, version, purpose & sections affected) — or noted as not applicable
✓ Ready for final upload